A useful UAP report starts with source separation. A witness account, a news story, a research note, and an official release can all be valuable, but they do not carry the same evidentiary weight.

UAP Radar's editorial model is built around keeping those categories visible so readers can understand what is known, what is claimed, and what still needs corroboration.

Editorial context: this is an explainer. It is intended to describe how the site evaluates source categories, not to resolve any single case.

Start With Source Type

Official records can establish that a report exists, but they may still leave the event unresolved. News coverage can add context, but it should be checked against documents. Witness reports can identify patterns, but they require careful handling.

Look For Corroboration

  • Does the report include time, location, and conditions?
  • Is there sensor data or independent observation?
  • Has a mundane explanation been evaluated?
  • Is the claim based on a primary source or a retelling?

Keep Speculation Separate

Speculation may be part of public discussion, but it should not be styled as verified fact. UAP Radar labels speculative items clearly and keeps them separate from official records, reporting, and research.